Within Review

Why 'We Do Not Know' Is Sometimes Correct

Insufficient data is often the most honest outcome when sensor quality or witness detail is too weak for a firm conclusion.

On this page

  • The difference between unresolved and anomalous
  • How missing sensor data blocks conclusions
  • When archived cases should be reopened
Preview for Why 'We Do Not Know' Is Sometimes Correct

Introduction

In a responsible UFO or UAP investigation, “unresolved” is not a failure state. It is often the most accurate conclusion available. Many sightings arrive with incomplete witness accounts, missing timestamps, poor-quality video, uncertain locations, absent sensor metadata, or no independent confirmation. In those conditions, forcing a neat explanation can be more misleading than admitting uncertainty.

Unresolved Cases illustration 1 This matters especially in AI-assisted UFO analysis. Automated systems are good at pattern matching, but they can also create false confidence. A machine-learning model may produce a likely match for an aircraft, satellite, drone or atmospheric effect even when the underlying evidence is too weak to support a reliable conclusion. Human review safeguards exist partly to prevent this pressure toward premature certainty.

NASA’s independent UAP study warned that present analysis is limited by poor sensor calibration, lack of multiple measurements, missing metadata and weak baseline data. [NASA Science]science.nasa.govScience Independent Study Team ReportNASA ScienceIndependent Study Team ReportSeptember 13, 2023 — At present, analysis of UAP data is hampered by poor sensor calibration, th…Published: September 13, 2023 [NASA]science.nasa.govScience Independent Study Team ReportNASA ScienceIndependent Study Team ReportSeptember 13, 2023 — At present, analysis of UAP data is hampered by poor sensor calibration, th…Published: September 13, 2023 In practical case work, that means some reports simply cannot be resolved honestly with the information available. Preserving that uncertainty is not evasive. It is evidence discipline.

The Difference Between Unresolved and Anomalous

One of the biggest mistakes in public UFO discussion is treating “unresolved” and “anomalous” as interchangeable. They are not the same thing.

An unresolved case means investigators lack enough reliable information to reach a firm conclusion. An anomalous case means the available evidence has survived strong attempts at explanation and still displays unusual characteristics. The difference is crucial.

A blurred infrared clip with no telemetry may be unresolved because investigators cannot determine whether the object is physical, a heat reflection, sensor glare or image-processing artefact. That does not automatically make it anomalous. AARO, the US Department of Defense office responsible for UAP analysis, has repeatedly used this distinction in published assessments. Some official cases remain unresolved specifically because the data cannot support a conclusive evaluation. [AARO]aaro.milAAROUAP ImageryHowever, due to the absence of corroborating telemetry or multi-modal sensor data, AARO cannot determine whether the obser…

This distinction protects investigations from two common errors:

  • False debunking: weakly assigning an ordinary explanation that the evidence does not actually support.
  • False escalation: treating lack of explanation as evidence of extraordinary technology.

In a disciplined workflow, unresolved means exactly what it says: investigators do not yet know enough.

That may sound unsatisfying, but it is more scientifically useful than attaching a label unsupported by evidence. In aviation safety, accident investigators often classify events as indeterminate when key evidence is missing. UFO investigations require the same restraint.

How Missing Sensor Data Blocks Conclusions

Most UFO reports are not built from laboratory-grade observations. They are built from fragments: a phone clip, a witness memory, a radar mention without raw logs, a compressed social media upload, or a sighting reported days later.

AI systems can organise and compare this material quickly, but they cannot manufacture missing information.

Why metadata matters more than dramatic footage

A striking video without metadata is often less useful than a mediocre image with complete timing and location data.

To analyse a sighting properly, investigators ideally need:

  • Exact date and time
  • Observer location
  • Viewing direction and elevation angle
  • Camera or sensor specifications
  • Exposure settings and zoom level
  • Weather conditions
  • Nearby aviation activity
  • Astronomical context
  • Original rather than compressed media

Without those details, estimates of speed, size and distance become unstable.

This is one reason UFO reports frequently produce exaggerated motion claims. A nearby insect crossing a camera lens can appear to accelerate instantly. A distant aircraft turning toward the observer can seem stationary. A satellite flare can appear to “vanish”. Without range data, apparent manoeuvres may be optical rather than physical.

NASA’s UAP report emphasised that poor calibration and missing metadata severely limit interpretation. [NASA Science]science.nasa.govScience Independent Study Team ReportNASA ScienceIndependent Study Team ReportSeptember 13, 2023 — At present, analysis of UAP data is hampered by poor sensor calibration, th…Published: September 13, 2023 [Wikisource]en.wikisource.orgWikisourceNASA Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Independent…14 Oct 2023 — The panel notes that, at present, gathering data on UAP is… The same issue appears repeatedly in official military cases. AARO has noted that some unresolved signatures cannot be distinguished confidently from reflections, thermal artefacts or display effects because corroborating measurements are absent. [AARO]aaro.milAARO Mission BriefMany cases in AARO's holdings remain unresolved because of a lack of verifiable data. Cases lacking sufficient data to…

Single-sensor sightings are especially fragile

One of the strongest safeguards in AI-assisted investigation is multi-source confirmation.

A sighting supported by:

  • visual observation,
  • radar,
  • infrared imaging,
  • independent witnesses,
  • and environmental consistency

is far easier to evaluate than a lone clip from a single device.

Many unresolved cases fail precisely because they depend on only one uncertain source.

A compressed night-time video may not preserve enough information to determine whether a light was:

  • Venus near the horizon,
  • atmospheric scintillation,
  • a drone,
  • or digital artefacts introduced during recording and upload.

AI may still generate ranked explanations, but ranking is not proof. Human reviewers must decide whether the evidence quality justifies any conclusion at all.

Why AI Systems Need Permission to Say “Unknown”

Automation systems are often designed to classify inputs into predefined categories. That creates a hidden risk in UFO analysis: the system may feel compelled to choose the “closest” explanation even when none fits well.

This is a classic pattern-recognition problem.

An AI model trained mostly on aircraft footage may incorrectly classify balloons or lens artefacts as aircraft because the training set lacks enough edge cases. Conversely, systems trained heavily on dramatic UFO imagery may overfit toward anomaly detection.

A responsible investigative workflow therefore needs an explicit “insufficient evidence” pathway.

The safest systems do not ask:

  • “What is this object?”

but instead:

  • “Does the evidence support identification?”

Those are different questions.

An AI-assisted case file should preserve:

  • confidence levels,
  • contradictory indicators,
  • missing variables,
  • and unresolved uncertainties.

Otherwise, automation can create a misleading appearance of precision.

This problem becomes more serious with probabilistic scoring. A model output such as “72% likely aircraft” can appear authoritative even when the underlying evidence is weak. In reality, the percentage may reflect similarity to training examples rather than confidence in ground truth.

Human reviewers are needed to detect when the model is extrapolating beyond what the evidence can bear.

Unresolved Cases illustration 2

Weak Data Can Produce Strong Stories

Some of the most famous UFO incidents remain controversial partly because the evidence is incomplete, degraded or filtered through retellings.

Over time, unresolved cases often accumulate:

  • reconstructed memories,
  • selective editing,
  • missing context,
  • folklore,
  • and exaggerated claims.

This can create the illusion that a case is stronger than it originally was.

In AI-assisted analysis, archival ingestion systems can unintentionally amplify that problem. If a case database treats later retellings as independent corroboration, the same story may appear artificially reinforced through repetition.

Human review helps separate:

  • original primary evidence,
  • later interpretation,
  • and narrative expansion.

This matters because uncertainty naturally attracts speculation. Once a case becomes culturally important, every gap in the evidence tends to be filled by assumption.

An unresolved case may therefore become famous not because the evidence is unusually strong, but because the ambiguity leaves room for competing interpretations.

When Archived Cases Should Be Reopened

Leaving a case unresolved does not mean abandoning it forever.

Some older sightings become more understandable when new data sources emerge. Modern investigation tools can sometimes revisit historic reports using:

  • archived weather records,
  • reconstructed satellite positions,
  • astronomical simulation software,
  • digitised radar logs,
  • declassified aviation activity,
  • and improved image analysis.

Cases once thought mysterious have later matched:

  • rocket re-entries,
  • classified aircraft programmes,
  • satellite trains,
  • atmospheric optics,
  • or known astronomical events.

At the same time, some cases remain unresolved because the original evidence was never preserved properly. A blurry photocopy of a photograph or a second-generation VHS recording may not contain enough recoverable information for modern analysis.

The key principle is that reopening a case should depend on the arrival of genuinely new evidence or improved context, not simply renewed public excitement.

Unresolved Cases illustration 3

What makes a reopening worthwhile

Archived cases are most useful to revisit when investigators gain access to:

  • Original media rather than copies
  • Precise timestamps
  • Newly released flight or satellite data
  • Additional witnesses
  • Better environmental reconstruction
  • Sensor information previously unavailable

Without that, reopening a case may simply recycle old uncertainty.

AARO itself has noted that many unresolved reports could likely be explained if better-quality data existed. [Metabunk]metabunk.orgAARO's Historical UAP ReportMetabunkAARO's Historical UAP Report - Volume 19 Mar 2024 — Sensors and visual observations are imperfect; the vast majority of cases lac… That principle applies equally to civilian archives.

The Human Value of Preserving Uncertainty

There is also a broader reason unresolved cases should remain unresolved when evidence is weak: credibility.

If investigators claim certainty too easily, public trust collapses when later information contradicts the conclusion. Overconfident debunking and overconfident extraordinary claims damage the field in the same way.

Careful uncertainty communicates something important:

  • the investigation distinguished between evidence and interpretation,
  • resisted pressure to produce a dramatic answer,
  • and preserved the integrity of the case file.

This is especially important in public-facing AI-assisted investigations. Readers should be able to see:

  • which facts are confirmed,
  • which explanations are plausible,
  • which claims remain speculative,
  • and where the evidence simply runs out.

A well-handled unresolved case is therefore not an investigative dead end. It is evidence that the process remained disciplined enough to stop where the data stopped.

Why “We Do Not Know” Is Sometimes the Most Reliable Answer

In UFO investigations, uncertainty is not automatically mysterious. Sometimes it simply reflects poor observation conditions, missing records or weak evidence.

The temptation to force closure is understandable. Humans prefer complete narratives. AI systems also tend to optimise toward categorisation rather than ambiguity. But good investigative practice requires a different standard.

A case should remain unresolved when:

  • the evidence cannot discriminate reliably between explanations,
  • key data is missing,
  • measurements are unverified,
  • witness accounts conflict,
  • or the available material is too degraded for dependable analysis.

That restraint is not anti-scientific. It is scientific.

The most responsible UFO investigations are not the ones that produce the most dramatic answers. They are the ones that preserve the difference between:

  • what was observed,
  • what can be tested,
  • what can be inferred,
  • and what still cannot honestly be known.

Endnotes

  1. Source: science.nasa.gov
    Title: Science Independent Study Team Report
    Link: https://science.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/uap-independent-study-team-final-report.pdf
    Source snippet

    NASA ScienceIndependent Study Team ReportSeptember 13, 2023 — At present, analysis of UAP data is hampered by poor sensor calibration, th...

    Published: September 13, 2023

  2. Source: nasa.gov
    Title: update nasa shares uap independent study report names director
    Link: https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/update-nasa-shares-uap-independent-study-report-names-director/
    Source snippet

    UPDATE: NASA Shares UAP Independent Study Report14 Sept 2023 — We found that NASA can help the whole-of-government UAP effort through sys...

  3. Source: aaro.mil
    Link: https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/Official-UAP-Imagery/
    Source snippet

    AAROUAP ImageryHowever, due to the absence of corroborating telemetry or multi-modal [sensor data]({{ 'sensor-data/' | relative_url }}), AARO cannot determine whether the obser...

  4. Source: aaro.mil
    Link: https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/AARO_Mission_Brief_2025.pdf
    Source snippet

    AARO Mission BriefMany cases in AARO's holdings remain unresolved because of a lack of verifiable data. Cases lacking sufficient data to...

  5. Source: en.wikisource.org
    Link: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/NASA_Unidentified_Anomalous_Phenomena%3A_Independent_Study_Team_Report/Responses_to_Statement_of_Task
    Source snippet

    WikisourceNASA Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Independent...14 Oct 2023 — The panel notes that, at present, gathering data on UAP is...

  6. Source: metabunk.org
    Title: AARO’s Historical UAP Report
    Link: https://www.metabunk.org/threads/aaros-historical-uap-report-volume-1.13375/
    Source snippet

    MetabunkAARO's Historical UAP Report - Volume 19 Mar 2024 — Sensors and visual observations are imperfect; the vast majority of cases lac...

  7. Source: aaro.mil
    Link: https://www.aaro.mil/

  8. Source: nasa.gov
    Title: nasa to release discuss unidentified anomalous phenomena report
    Link: https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-to-release-discuss-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-report/
    Source snippet

    NASA to Release, Discuss Unidentified Anomalous...NASA commissioned the study to examine UAP from a scientific perspective and create a...

  9. Source: science.nasa.gov
    Link: https://science.nasa.gov/uap/
    Source snippet

    nasa.govUAP9 Jun 2022 — The UAP Independent Study serves as a community-based, interdisciplinary forum for soliciting and coordinating co...

  10. Source: en.wikisource.org
    Link: [https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Page%3AUAP_Independent_Study_Team_-Final_Report.pdf/5](https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Page%3AUAP_Independent_Study_Team-_Final_Report.pdf/5)
    Source snippet

    wikisource.orgPage:UAP Independent Study Team - Final Report.pdf/512 Nov 2023 — At present, analysis of UAP data is hampered by poor sens...

  11. Source: metabunk.org
    Title: aaro mission process and data statistics patterns.13087
    Link: https://www.metabunk.org/threads/aaro-mission-process-and-data-statistics-patterns.13087/
    Source snippet

    AARO: Mission, process, and data statistics/patterns3 Aug 2023 — While a large number of cases in AARO's holdings remain technically unre...

  12. Source: media.defense.gov
    Title: DOPSR 2024 0263 AARO HISTORICAL RECORD REPORT VOLUME 1 2024
    Link: https://media.defense.gov/2024/Mar/08/2003409233/-1/-1/0/DOPSR-2024-0263-AARO-HISTORICAL-RECORD-REPORT-VOLUME-1-2024.PDF
    Source snippet

    Historical Record Report Volume 18 Mar 2024 — Results: Project GRUDGE investigated 244 reports of UFO sightings. It did not discover any...

  13. Source: dvidshub.net
    Link: https://www.dvidshub.net/video/977839/pr-008-unresolved-uap-report-europe-2022
    Source snippet

    PR-008, Unresolved UAP Report, Europe 2022The United States European Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon t...

  14. Source: dvidshub.net
    Link: https://www.dvidshub.net/video/988675/pr-017-unresolved-uap-report-europe-2024
    Source snippet

    PR-017, Unresolved UAP Report, Europe 2024This unresolved report contributes to AARO's historical and locational trend analyses. VIDEO IN...

  15. Source: dvidshub.net
    Link: https://www.dvidshub.net/video/973055/pr-003-unresolved-uap-report-africa-2023
    Source snippet

    PR-003, Unresolved UAP Report, Africa 2023... (AARO) consisting of... sensor display error. The available data is insufficient to evalua...

  16. Source: war.gov
    Link: https://www.war.gov/UFO/
    Source snippet

    Presidential Unsealing and Reporting System for UAP...8 May 2026 — The materials archived here are unresolved cases, meaning the governm...

    Published: May 2026

Additional References

  1. Source: airsafe.com
    Link: https://airsafe.com/issues/uap.htm
    Source snippet

    NARCAP and unexplained aerial phenomenaContact NARCAP: NARCAP encourages aviation professionals who witness UAPs to send a confidential r...

  2. Source: managingexpectations.net
    Link: https://managingexpectations.net/blog/articles/nasa-uap-study-managing-expectations.html
    Source snippet

    NASA's UAP Study: What It Did — and Did Not — ConcludeThe panel said UAP analysis is hampered by “poor sensor calibration,” a lack of mul...

  3. Source: medium.com
    Link: https://medium.com/%40timventura/ufos-and-radar-targets-clutter-safety-and-false-certainty-c3eab7a878ad
    Source snippet

    UFOs and Radar: Targets, Clutter, Safety, and False CertaintyThe public can say, with some justification, that hundreds of cases remain u...

  4. Source: rev.com
    Link: https://www.rev.com/transcripts/nasa-holds-first-public-meeting-on-ufos-transcript
    Source snippet

    NASA Holds First Public Meeting on UFOs TranscriptThe UAP independent study was commissioned to create a roadmap on how to use the tools...

  5. Source: space.com
    Title: pentagon ufo office aaro historical report no emprical evidence alien technology
    Link: https://www.space.com/pentagon-ufo-office-aaro-historical-report-no-emprical-evidence-alien-technology
    Source snippet

    Pentagon UFO office finds 'no empirical evidence' for alien...8 Mar 2024 — The Pentagon's UFO office has once again stressed that it has...

  6. Source: thedebrief.org
    Title: aaros historical report a tale of factual errors and old mistakes repeated
    Link: https://thedebrief.org/aaros-historical-report-a-tale-of-factual-errors-and-old-mistakes-repeated/
    Source snippet

    AARO's Historical Report: A Tale of Factual Errors and Old...14 Mar 2024 — “Although many UAP reports remain unsolved, AARO assesses tha...

  7. Source: youtube.com
    Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQcqOW39ksk
    Source snippet

    Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Independent Study ReportNASA commissioned an independent study team to examine unidentified anomalous ph...

  8. Source: nevadacurrent.com
    Title: nasa report finds no evidence that ufos are extraterrestrial
    Link: https://nevadacurrent.com/2023/09/18/nasa-report-finds-no-evidence-that-ufos-are-extraterrestrial/
    Source snippet

    18 Sept 2023 — Analysis of this data is “hampered by poor sensor calibration, the lack of multiple measurements, the lack of sensor metad...

  9. Source: thedebrief.org
    Title: nasas unidentified anomalous phenomena report key takeaways
    Link: https://thedebrief.org/nasas-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-report-key-takeaways/
    Source snippet

    NASA's Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Report14 Sept 2023 — “At present, analysis of UAP data is hampered by poor sensor calibration, th...

  10. Source: leonarddavid.com
    Title: nasa report released unidentified anomalous phenomena uap
    Link: https://www.leonarddavid.com/nasa-report-released-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-uap/
    Source snippet

    Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) – UPDATED14 Sept 2023 — NASA has released its Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) report comple...

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to Why 'We Do Not Know' Is Sometimes Correct. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

BookCover for UFOs

UFOs

By Leslie Kean

Directly matches evidence-based UFO investigation, witness cases, and analytical treatment of sightings.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Example marketplace items related to this page. Use the search link to explore similar finds on eBay.

Using USA

Topic Tree

Follow this branch

Parent topic

Review

Related pages 4

More on this topic 3